Early Draft - for review purposes only

University of Connecticut

Department of History - History 101:90

Modern Western Traditions

 


Thursday Evenings from 1900-2200

Instructor: Steven H. Park

Telephone: 486-2315

e-mail: Steven.Park@uconn.edu

WebCT: http://webct.uconn.edu

 

Purpose:

This course is designed to introduce students to the history of political institutions, economic systems, social structures, and cultures in the modern Western world.  This course meets the University's Group 5 Culture and Modern Society requirement for a WESTERN course.  As far as I know, all of the schools/colleges at UConn accept History 101.

This course will combine a broad narrative sweep interspersed with close examination of the some emerging scholarship of persons traditionally excluded from historical narrative.

 

Objectives:

At the conclusion of this course students should be able to articulate orally, and in writing, the main themes of the development of the modern Atlantic World. Students should be able to critically examine the issues raised by the book author and the instructor. Work with primary documents will help students better understand the historian’s craft. The work of the historian is usually done through gathering evidence, analysis, writing, argument formation, and debate.   These are the skills we be working on in this class.


Texts:

Spielvogel, Jackson J., Western Civilization, Vol. II, Since 1550, Fourth Edition (Wadsworth Publishing: Thomson Learning, 2000)

If you purchase a new copy of Spielvogel, Western Civ Vol II Since 1550 (4e) at the COOP it comes bundled with a password for supplemental study materials in WebCT.  If you purchase (or have) a previously-owned copy you may purchase the WebCT password at http://www.webct.co m/accesscodes. Once you log on with this password, it will be “consumed” by the software and you will only need your student ID number for future access. 

 $75 (book and access code)

$15 (access code only)

Optional Course Pack available at the Avery Point COOP as well. Note: The instructor does not profit from the sale of any of these items.

Term Paper and Class Presentation:

Students will write a 6-8-page paper on one of the topics recommended by the instructor.  Sinc e this is an introductory survey course, I am not expecting you to do extensive multi-archival research.  But, you will have to acquire sufficient knowledge of your subject in order to make an intelligent 10-15 minute presentation to the class.  This presentation must go beyond the basic information in the text.  You are to formulate a thesis and support it with arguments.  It will require some extra effort on your part, this is why there is no additional work during the last few weeks of the course. The instructor, on a first-come, first-served basis, will approve only one presentation per topic.  A low-tech random-selection process will determine the date of your particular presentation.  Please see WebCT for instructions for the proper completion of the paper.

Attendance:

Attendance is crucial in this class.  Students are expected to come to class prepared to discuss the readings. If you must miss a class, let me know ahead of time.  In an emergency, if you must miss a class; you are responsible to make-up work missed and to get the class notes from another student.  A receipt from the doctor’s office or the tow-truck driver will serve as evidence.

Extra Credit:

I do not give “extra credit” assignments.  I would prefer that you put all of your energies into the assigned work and do your very best at those tasks.


Grading:

Oral presentation and class participation 20%
Written Work (quizzes and paper) 30%
Mid-term exam 25%
Final exam 25%


Class Schedule:

plan your reading schedule (not all weeks have exactly the same reading load)

Week One:

Introduction to the course

§         WebCT and supplemental readings

§         Practice Quiz

§         The Reformation

  Week Two: – Take quiz in WebCT

·        Ch. 14 - Discovery and Cris is in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries

·        Ch. 15 - Response to Crisis : State Building and the Search for Order in the Seventeenth Century

Spielvogel, pp. 392-458

·        Watts, Pauline Moffitt, "Prophecy and Discovery: On the Spiri tual Origins of Christopher Columbus’s 'Enterprise of the Indies'."  The American Historical Review, Volume 90, Issue 1, Supplement to Volume 90 (Feb., 1985), 73-102

·       Walzer, Michael, "Puritanism as a Revolutionary Ideology." History and Theory, Volume 3, Issue 1 (1963), 59-90.

Week Three: – Take quiz in WebCT

·        Ch. 16 - Toward a New Heave n and a New Earth: The Scientific Revolution the Emergence of Modern Science

·        Ch. 17 - The Eighteenth Cen tury: An Age of Enlightenment

Spielvogel, pp. 460-514

·        Austin, William H., "Isaac Newton on Science and Religion," Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 31, Issue 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1970), 521-542.

·        Howe, Daniel Walker, "The Decline of Calvinism: An Approach to Its Study." Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 14, Issue 3 (Jun., 1972), 306-327.

Week Four: – Take quiz in WebCT

·        Ch. 18 - The Eighteenth Cen tury: European States, International Wars, and Social Change

·        Ch. 19 - A Revolution in Po litics: The Era of the French Revolution and Napoleon

Spielvogel, pp. 516-579

·        Nash, Gary B., “The American Clergy and the French Revolution,” William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Volume 22, Issue 3 (Jul., 1965), 392-412

·        Calhoon, Robert M., “William Smith Jr.’s Alternative to the American Revolution,” William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Volume 22, Issue 1 (Jan., 1965), 105-118.

Week Five: – Take quiz in WebCT

·        Ch. 20 - The Industrial Rev olution and Its Impact on European Society

·        Ch. 21 - Reaction, Revoluti on, and Romanticism, 1815-1850

Spielvogel, pp. 582-641

·        Desan, Suzanne, “The Role of Women in Religious Riots During the French Revolution,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, Volume 22, Issue 3, Special Issue: The French Revolution in Culture (Spring, 1989), 451-468.

·        Bolster, W. Jeffrey, “’To Feel Like a Man’: Black Seamen in the Northern States, 1800-1860,” The Journal of American History, Volume 76, Issue 4 (Mar. 1990), 1173-1199.

Week Six:-Take quiz in WebCT

 

Spielvogel, pp. 644-707

·        Fletcher, Max E., "The Suez Canal and World Shipping, 1869-1914." The Journal of Economic History, Volume 18, Issue 4 (Dec., 1958), 556-573.

·        Borocz, Jozef, "Travel-Capitalism: The Structure of Europe and the Advent of the Tourist." Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 34, Issue 4 (Oct., 1992), 708-741.

Week Seven: - Midterm Exam Period

Week Eight: – Take quiz in WebCT – e-mail me a brief statement of your topic

Spring Break

Spielvogel, pp. 710-779

·        Ausubel, Herman, “General Booth’s Scheme of Social Salvation,” The American Historical Review, Volume 56, Issue 3 (Apr. 1953), 519-525.

·        Lundeberg, Philip K., “The German Naval Critique of the U-Boat Campaign, 1915-1918,” Military Affairs, Volume 27, Issue 3 (Autumn, 1963), 105-118.

Week Nine: -Take quiz in WebCT

Spielvogel, pp. 781-845

·        Coox, Alvin D., “Repulsing the Pearl Harbor Revisionists: The State of Present Literature on the Debacle,” Military Affairs, Volume 50, Issue 1 (Jan, 1986), 29-31.

·        Mengus, Raymond, “Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Decision to Resist,” The Journal of Modern History, Volume 64, Issue Supplement: Resistance Against the Third Reich (Dec. 1992), S134-S146.

·        Baranowski, Shelley, “Consent and Dissent: The Confessing Church and Conservative Opposition to National Socialism,” The Journal of Modern History, Volume 59, Issue 1 (Mar., 1987), 53-78.

Week Ten: -Take quiz in WebCT -hand in a developed thesis statement, outline, and an unannotated bibliography of at least eight items.

Spielvogel, pp. 847-912

Week Eleven:

Film and/or class presentations and work on your paper

 

Week Twelve:

Film and/or class presentations and work on your paper

 

Week Thirteen:

class presentations and hand in your paper and annotated bibliography

 

Week Fourteen:

Review for Final Exam and course evaluation

 

Final Exam: Date, Final Exam week is

Our exam will most likely be xxx from 2000-2200


  STUDENT CONDUCT CODE 

XI. Academic Misconduct


All students have the right to pursue their academic careers in an atmosphere based on honesty and trust. Acts of academic misconduct destroy that atmosphere, violate that trust, and are therefore subject to penalty. This section of the Student Conduct Code defines what acts of academic misconduct are and presents the procedure for imposing penalties for such acts. Acts of academic misconduct necessarily involve the Academic Deans, Department Heads, and Faculty. Therefore, the procedures for investigating complaints and imposing penalties for academic misconduct differ somewhat from those applied to social misconduct.

 

A fundamental concept of all educational institutions is academic honesty. All academic work depends upon respect for and acknowledgment of research and ideas of others. Misrepresentation of someone else's work as one's own is a most serious offense in any academic setting.

No academic misconduct, including any forms of cheating and plagiarism, can be condoned. Academic misconduct includes but is not limited to providing or receiving assistance in a manner not authorized by the instructor in the creation of work to be submitted for academic evaluation including papers, projects, and examinations; attempting to influence one's academic evaluation for reasons other than academic achievement or merit; presenting, as one's own, the ideas or words of another for academic evaluation without proper acknowledgment; doing unauthorized academic work for which another person will receive credit or be evaluated; and presenting the same or substantially the same papers or projects in two or more courses without the explicit permission of the instructors involved.

Also, one is not allowed to cooperate or be an accessory to another's academic misconduct. Thus a student who writes a paper or does an assignment for another student is an accomplice and must be held accountable just as severely as the other. It is perhaps less obvious, but it is equally logical, that a student who knowingly permits another to copy from his or her own paper, examination, or project should be held as accountable as the student who submits the copied material.